Javasatu:Penilaian konten

Halaman ini mendokumentasikan editing guideline di Wikipedia bahasa Indonesia.

Isinya adalah standar yang telah diterima secara luas dan para pengguna harus berusaha untuk mengikutinya, meskipun sebaiknya diperlakukan dengan akal sehat, dan pengecualian mungkin berlaku pada situasi tertentu. Setiap suntingan yang substansial di halaman ini harus menggambarkan konsensus. Jika ragu, diskusikan terlebih dahulu di halaman pembicaraannya.

Pintas: WP:ASSESS WP:1.0/A

The following system is used by the Wikipedia community to assess the quality of an article on a particular topic. The system is based on a letter scheme which reflects principally how factually complete the article is, though language quality and layout are also factors.

The quality assessments are mainly performed by Wikipedia editors, who tag talk pages of articles. These tags are then collected by a bot, which generates output such as a log and statistics. For more information, see Using the bot. (Note that when more than one WikiProject has rated an article, the bot will take the best rating as the rating of the overall article.) The WP:1.0 team is planning to set things up to use a second bot to select articles, based on the assessments performed by WikiProjects.

Two levels, GA (Good Article) and FA (Featured Article), are assessments made by independent editors. Other levels are assessed by individual WikiProject editors. GAs are generally reviewed by a single editor, and FA by several editors. Candidates are nominated by listing them at WP:Good article nominations and WP:Featured article candidates. Judgments are made according to the criteria at WP:Good article criteria and WP:Featured article criteria, and the results are listed at WP:Good articles and WP:Featured articles.

It is vital that editors not take these assessments of their contributions personally. It is understood that we each have our own opinions of the priorities of the objective criteria for a perfect article. Generally an active project will develop a consensus, though be aware that different projects may use their own variation of the criteria more tuned for the subject area, such as this. More active WikiProjects have an assessment team. If you contribute a lot of content to an article you may request an independent assessment.

At present this assessment system is in use in the Wikipedia 1.0 project, and in several hundred WikiProjects on the English Wikipedia. As of November 2022, over seven million articles have been assessed. Several other languages are also using this assessment system or a derivative thereof.

Grades

The assessment ratings mentioned here have no relationship whatsoever to academic grades or review scores like A/B/C/D/F or other rating systems (10-point scale, 5-star system, etc.) that you might see on homework and product reviews. They represent the amount of work needed to bring the article to the next rating, which depends on both the quality of the writing and the depth of coverage of the topic, which greatly varies by subject.

Note that the differences between Stub, Start, and C classes are fairly subjective; at those ratings, the best way to improve the article is to look at the specific criteria for B-class and aim to satisfy those. Specific feedback can often be obtained on a relevant WikiProject's talk page. Those can usually be found the talk page of the article, but searching for them can often reveal more topical projects. For instance, if you wrote about a Kenyan astronomer, you might want to search for "Biography", "Kenya", and "Astronomy" to find WikiProject Biography, WikiProject Kenya and WikiProject Astronomy.

Skala kualitas artikel ProyekWiki

Skala	Ikon	Kriteria	Pengalaman pembaca	Saran untuk penyunting	Contoh
Pilihan		Artikel telah meraih status artikel pilihan (AP) setelah melalui peninjauan mendalam oleh peninjau yang tidak memihak berdasarkan kriteria artikel pilihan.	Profesional, sangat baik, dan lengkap. Artikel menjadi sumber definitif informasi ensiklopedis	Tidak memerlukan suntingan lebih lanjut kecuali muncul informasi baru. Pengembangan lebih lanjut atas artikel-artikel ini sangat jarang diperlukan.	Daftar artikel pilihan
Kelas-A		Artikel ditulis dengan baik dan menjelaskan topik secara lengkap, seperti dijabarkan dalam pedoman pengembangan artikel. Panjang artikel sesuai dengan topik yang dimaksud, dengan paragraf pembuka yang ditulis dengan baik serta sejumlah subbagian yang disusun secara tepat. Artikel juga harus memiliki referensi dari sumber tepercaya yang luas, berupa referensi literatur dan bukan situs web. Artikel memiliki ilustrasi yang baik tanpa ada masalah hak cipta.	Sangat berguna bagi pembaca. Pembaca nonpakar pada subjek umumnya tidak memerlukan informasi lanjutan.	Pengetahuan seorang pakar mungkin dibutuhkan untuk mengembangkan artikel. Perbaikan gaya mungkin diperlukan.
Bagus		Artikel telah meraih status artikel bagus (AB) setelah melalui peninjauan oleh peninjau yang tidak memihak berdasarkan kriteria artikel bagus.	Berguna bagi hampir seluruh pembaca, tanpa ada masalah yang nyata; mendekati (tetapi tidak menyamai) kualitas ensiklopedia profesional.	Beberapa suntingan oleh pakar subjek dan gaya akan sangat membantu; membandingkan dengan artikel pilihan pada topik yang sama dapat menemukan bagian yang kurang atau masih lemah.	Daftar artikel bagus
Kelas-B	Berkas:Symbol b class.svg	Artikel hampir lengkap tetapi masih belum memiliki beberapa unsur atau referensi yang penting. Penggunaan bahasa Indonesia yang baik masih dibutuhkan. Artikel telah memenuhi kriteria artikel kelas-B.	Berguna, tetapi tidak bagi semua pembaca. Artikel bisa dipakai sebagai bahan referensi pelajar tetapi belum bisa dipakai sebagai bahan referensi mahasiswa atau peneliti.	Artikel masih perlu dikembangkan dan dirapikan lebih lanjut agar dapat memenuhi pedoman gaya dan pedoman lainnya.
Kelas-C	Berkas:Symbol c class.svg	Artikel telah substansial tetapi masih belum memiliki konten penting atau mengandung banyak materi yang tidak relevan. Artikel harus memiliki beberapa referensi ke sumber tepercaya, tetapi mungkin masih memiliki masalah yang signifikan atau perlu pembersihan secara substansial.	Berguna untuk pembaca biasa, tetapi tidak akan memberikan gambaran lengkap bahkan untuk studi yang cukup mendetail.	Perlu suntingan yang cukup untuk menutup celah dalam konten serta perlu dibersihkan dan dirapikan.
Awal	Berkas:Symbol start class.svg	Artikel yang sedang berkembang tetapi masih kurang berbobot di beberapa bagian penting. Contohnya artikel Afrika yang membahas geografi secara panjang tetapi kurang dalam bagian sejarah dan budaya. Artikel belum dilengkapi gambar, belum dibagi atas subbagian-subbagian atau referensi yang memadai.	Menyediakan informasi yang umum saja sehingga pembaca masih harus mencari sumber lainnya untuk mendapatkan informasi yang lengkap.	Menambahkan isi dari sumber tepercaya. Artikel ini membutuhkan peningkatan substansial dalam isi dan penyusunan, serta memperbaiki tata bahasa, ejaan, dan gaya penulisan.
Rintisan	Berkas:Symbol stub class.svg	Artikel masih sangat pendek atau belum bisa menjelaskan tentang subjeknya (misalnya isi artikel tidak relevan atau tidak dapat dipahami).	Belum bisa banyak bermanfaat bagi pembaca, mungkin hanya sedikit lebih menjelaskan dibandingkan definisi kamus.	Pengembangan lebih lanjut sangat dibutuhkan. Suntingan dan tambahan apa pun dapat membantu, terutama penjelasan yang bermakna. Agar dapat naik ke artikel kelas awal, perlu ditambahkan alasan dengan rujukan tentang mengapa topik tersebut signifikan.

Skema jenis artikel ProyekWiki

Kelas	Kriteria	Untuk pembaca	Untuk penyunting	Contoh
Berkas:Symbol list class.svg Daftar	Memenuhi kriteria daftar yang berdiri sendiri, yang merupakan artikel yang terutama berisi daftar, biasanya terdiri dari tautan ke artikel dalam bidang subjek tertentu.	Tidak ada format yang ditetapkan untuk daftar, tetapi organisasinya harus logis dan bermanfaat bagi pembaca.	Daftar harus berupa daftar tautan langsung ke artikel Wikipedia, yang dinamai dengan tepat dan terorganisir.	Templat:Oldid (per Juni 2018)

Note: Some WikiProjects omit some of the standard classes, most often A-class, especially when they lack an assessment team.

Non-standard grades

Pintasan:

WP:NONSTANDARDCLASS

Some WikiProjects use other assessments for mainspace content that do not fit into the above scale:

Other WikiProject assessments
Label	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editing suggestions	Example
Current	A topic where details are subject to change often. The article covers an event or topic that is currently ongoing, such as a natural disaster or sports season.	Amount of meaningful content varies over time as the projected event goes on.	Material added might quickly become obsolete.	Templat:Oldid (as of August 2019)
Depan	A topic where details are subject to change often. The article covers a future topic, e.g. a forthcoming election or album release, and article content may change as new information arises.	Amount of meaningful content varies over time as the projected event draws near.	Material added might be speculative and should be carefully sourced.	Templat:Oldid (as of October 2019)
Templat:SL-Class	A list article that would otherwise be regarded as a stub. Used only by a few WikiProjects.	May be incomplete or provide little context.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority.	Templat:Oldid (as of July 2019)
Templat:SIA-Class	Any set index article (SIA) page falls under this class. These are list articles about a set of items of a specific type that also share the same (or similar) name.	The page lists related items of the same name.	An SIA need not follow the formatting rules for disambiguation pages	Templat:Oldid (as of May 2018)
Disambig	Any disambiguation page falls under this class.	The page directs the reader to other pages of the same title.	Additions should be made as new articles of that name are created.	Templat:Oldid (as of August 2019)
Templat:Redirect-Class	Any redirect falls under this class.	The page does not display any article content and redirects to a related topic.	Ensure that the redirect is appropriately categorised.	Templat:Oldid (as of October 2016)
Merge	Any redirect that is the result of a page merge and has non-trivial history. Used only by a few WikiProjects.	The page does not display any article content and redirects to a related topic.	Tag the redirect page with {{R from merge}}	Templat:Oldid (as of August 2018)
Templat:Needed-Class	May be used to identify redirects that could be expanded into articles, or articles with content that could be split off to form a new page.	Content may not yet exist for the desired topic.	Editors are encouraged to be bold when updating the encyclopedia.	Templat:Oldid (as of March 2018)
Templat:NA-Class	A page that does not fit into any other category. Used as a "catch-all" by all WikiProjects.	Depends on the type of page.	Depends on the type of page.	N/A

See also Javasatu:WikiProject Military history/Assessment which utilises a parallel scheme of "CL-Class", "BL-Class" and "AL-Class" for list articles.

Non-mainspace content

Further grades are commonly used by WikiProjects to categorise relevant pages in other namespaces. The precise application of these grades may vary depending on their usage by individual WikiProjects.

Non-mainspace assessments
Label	Criteria	Example
Berkas:Folder Hexagonal Icon.svg Kategori	Any category falls under this class.	Category:George Orwell
Draft	Any draft falls under this class. These are typically found in the Draft namespace, but may also be in the User namespace.	Draft:Example
Berkas	Any file falls under this class; may also include timed text pages.	File:Flag of Australia.svg
GP	Any file which has attained featured picture or featured sound status.	File:Felis silvestris silvestris.jpg
Portal	Any portal falls under this class.	Portal:Biography
Proyek	Any project page falls under this class; may also include help pages.	Javasatu:WikiProject Japan
Templat	Any template falls under this class; may also include modules or userboxes.	Template:Magnapop
User	Any user page falls under this class.	User:Legoktm/afcnew.js

Note that some WikiProjects deal exclusively with non-mainspace content and may use their own customised assessment schemes tailored to a specific purpose: see Javasatu:WikiProject Portals/Assessment for one such example.

For an index of all WikiProject assessment pages, see Category:WikiProject assessments.

Evolution of an article – an example

Templat:Outdated This clickable imagemap, using the article "Atom" as an example, demonstrates the typical profile for an article's development through the levels. Hold the mouse over a number to see key events, and click on a number to see that version of the article. Please note that until 2008, a C-class rating did not exist on the project, and as such this grading is retroactive. Also, in 2006 references were much less used, and inline references were quite rare; a barely-B-Class article today would typically have many more references than this article did in late 2006.

Kesalahan: Gambar tidak sah atau tidak ditemukan.

Importance assessment

There is a separate scale for rating articles for importance or priority, which is unrelated to the quality scale outlined here. Unlike the quality scale, the priority scale varies based on the project scope. See also the template {{importance scheme}}.

Statistics

The WP 1.0 bot tracks assessment data (article quality and importance data for individual WikiProjects) assigned via talk page banners. If you would like to add a new WikiProject to the bot's list, please read the instructions at Javasatu:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Using the bot.

The global summary table below is computed by taking the highest quality and importance rating for each assessed article in the main namespace.

Pengguna:WP 1.0 bot/WikiWork

All rated articles by quality and importance
Quality	Importance
Quality	SP	P	CP	KP	???	Total
FA	1,527	2,396	2,345	1,826	178	8,272
FL	167	624	705	664	110	2,270
A	342	667	777	563	83	2,432
AB	3,066	6,969	14,143	18,238	1,695	44,111
B	16,036	30,963	50,751	60,386	17,906	176,042
C	16,089	51,303	127,499	276,043	77,671	548,605
Awal	18,587	90,798	404,166	1,507,793	382,788	2,404,132
Rintisan	4,264	31,756	278,469	2,732,305	761,352	3,808,146
Daftar	4,628	16,293	50,936	177,861	57,895	307,613
Templat:Assessed-Class	64,706	231,769	929,791	4,775,679	1,299,678	7,301,623
Unassessed	114	467	1,210	19,314	429,169	450,274
Total	64,820	232,236	931,001	4,794,993	1,728,847	7,751,897

About this table

FAQ

Purpose

What is the purpose of article assessments?: The assessment system allows a WikiProject to monitor the quality of articles in its subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. The ratings are also used by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content.
Are these ratings official?: Not really; these ratings are meant primarily for the internal use of the project, and usually do not imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole.

Assessing articles

Who can assess articles?: In general, anyone can add or change an article's rating. However, assessing an article as "A-Class" generally requires the agreement of at least two editors, and the "GA" and "FA" labels should only be used on articles that have been reviewed and are currently designated as good articles or featured articles, respectively. Individual WikiProjects may also have more formal procedures for rating an article, and please note that the WikiProject bears ultimate responsibility for resolving disputes.
How do I assess an article?: Consult the quality scale above; once you have chosen the level that seems to be closest to the article, set the class parameter in the WikiProject banner template to the level's name (omitting "Class" from the end). For example, to rate an article as "B-Class", use |class=B in the banner. Again, the "FA" and "GA" labels should not be added to articles unless they are currently designated as such. Tools in the See also section can help with the assessment process.
How can I ask for an article to be assessed?: To have an independent editor review an article, post a request at Javasatu:WikiProject Wikipedia/Assessment#Requesting an assessment.

Common concerns

Someone put a project banner template on an article, but it's not really within the WikiProject's scope. What should I do?: Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the article's talk page (or directly with the person who tagged the article). See Javasatu:WikiProject Council/Guide#Article tagging for more information.
What if I don't agree with a rating?: Feel free to change it—within reason—if you think a different rating is justified; in the case of major disputes, the WikiProject as a whole can discuss the issue and come to a consensus as to the best rating.
Aren't the ratings subjective?: Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments?: Due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning. Javasatu:Peer review is the process designed to provide detailed comments.