Javasatu:Penilaian konten: Perbedaan antara revisi

← Revisi sebelumnya

Javasatu:Penilaian konten (sunting)

Revisi per 6 Oktober 2023 14.30

37 bita dihapus , 2 tahun yang lalu

tidak ada ringkasan suntingan

VisualTeks wiki

Adminjavasatu

Birokrat, Pengurus antarmuka, Pengurus

11.314

suntingan

@@ Baris 4: / Baris 4: @@
 {{subcat guideline|editing guideline|Version 1.0 Editorial Team Assessment|WP:ASSESS|WP:1.0/A}}
-The following system is used by the Wikipedia community to assess the quality of an article on a particular topic. The system is based on a letter scheme which reflects principally how factually complete the article is, though [[WP:MOS|language quality]] and [[WP:Layout|layout]] are also factors.
+Sistem ini digunakan komunitas Javasatu untuk menilai kualitas artikel pada setiap topik. The system is based on a letter scheme which reflects principally how factually complete the article is, though [[WP:MOS|language quality]] and [[WP:Layout|layout]] are also factors.
 The quality assessments are mainly performed by Wikipedia editors, who tag talk pages of articles. These tags are then [[Javasatu:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Index|collected by a bot]], which generates output such as a [[Javasatu:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Chemistry articles by quality log|log]] and [[Javasatu:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Chemistry articles by quality statistics|statistics]]. For more information, see ''[[Javasatu:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Using the bot|Using the bot]]''. (Note that when more than one WikiProject has rated an article, the bot will take the best rating as the rating of the overall article.) The WP:1.0 team is planning to set things up to use a ''second'' bot to select articles, based on the assessments performed by WikiProjects.
-Two levels, GA (Good Article) and FA (Featured Article), are assessments made by independent editors. Other levels are assessed by individual WikiProject editors. GAs are generally reviewed by a single editor, and FA by several editors. Candidates are nominated by listing them at ''[[WP:Good article nominations]]'' and ''[[WP:Featured article candidates]]''. Judgments are made according to the criteria at ''[[WP:Good article criteria]]'' and ''[[WP:Featured article criteria]]'', and the results are listed at ''[[WP:Good articles]]'' and ''[[WP:Featured articles]]''.
+Dua tingkatan, yakni GA (Good Article) and FA (Featured Article), dinilai oleh editor yang independen. Level lainnya dinilai oleh individu editor ProyekJS. GA umumnya diulas oleh satu editor, sedangkan FA oleh beberapa editor. Para kandidat dinominasikan dengan mendaftarkan mereka di ''[[WP:Good article nominations]]'' dan ''[[WP:Featured article candidates]]''. Penilaian berdasarkan kriteria pada ''[[WP:Good article criteria]]'' dan ''[[WP:Featured article criteria]]'', dan hasilnya disusun pada ''[[WP:Good articles]]'' dan ''[[WP:Featured articles]]''.
 It is vital that editors not take these assessments of their contributions personally. It is understood that we each have our own opinions of the priorities of the objective criteria for a perfect article. Generally an active project will develop a consensus, though be aware that different projects may use their own variation of the criteria more tuned for the subject area, such as [[Javasatu:WikiProject Military history/Assessment#Quality scale|this]]. More active WikiProjects have an [[:Category:WikiProject assessments|assessment team]]. If you contribute a lot of content to an article you may request an independent assessment.