ProyekJS - Riwayat revisi

Adminjavasatu: /* WikiProjects and assessments of article importance and quality */

2023-10-06T07:08:18Z

WikiProjects and assessments of article importance and quality

← Revisi sebelumnya		Revisi per 6 Oktober 2023 14.08
Baris 20:		Baris 20:
	}}		}}

	===~~WikiProjects and assessments of article importance and quality~~===		===ProyekJS dan asesmen urgensi dan kualitas artikel===
	{{Self reference\|For related Wikipedia administration pages see [[Wikipedia:Content assessment]].}}		{{Self reference\|For related Wikipedia administration pages see [[Wikipedia:Content assessment]].}}
	In 2007, ~~the English~~ Wikipedia ~~introduced an assessment scale of the quality of articles~~.<ref name="WP 1.0 editorial team 1">{{citation \|title=Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment\|title-link=Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment}}</ref>{{Self-published inline\|date=November 2022}} ~~Articles are rated by~~ WikiProjects. ~~The range of quality classes begins with~~ "~~Stub~~" (~~very short pages~~), ~~followed by~~ "Start", "C" and "B" (~~in increasing order of quality~~). ~~Community peer review is needed for the article to enter one of the highest quality classes~~: ~~either~~ "A", "good article" ~~or the highest~~, "featured article". ~~Of the about~~ 4.4 ~~million articles and lists assessed as of March~~ 2015, ~~about~~ 7,000 (0.16%) ~~are a~~ featured article or a featured list. One featured article per day, as selected by editors, appears on the main page of Wikipedia.<ref name="FMonday feat article patterns 1">{{cite journal\|url=https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2365/2182\|title=Comparing featured article groups and revision patterns correlations in Wikipedia\|journal=[[First Monday (journal)\|First Monday]]\|date=8 April 2009\|doi=10.5210/fm.v14i5.2365\|access-date=July 13, 2010\|last1=Poderi\|first1=Giacomo \|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="IBM feat articles hidden pattern 1">{{cite journal\|url=http://www.research.ibm.com/visual/papers/hidden_order_wikipedia.pdf\|author1=Fernanda B. Viégas \|author2=Martin Wattenberg \|author3=Matthew M. McKeon \|name-list-style=amp \|title=The Hidden Order of Wikipedia\|publisher=Visual Communication Lab, IBM Research\|date=July 22, 2007\|access-date=October 30, 2007}}</ref> According to research in 2021, WikiProject [[Tropical cyclone\|Tropical Cyclones]] has the most quality content in terms of good articles and featured articles. This is unusual, due to the project's narrow scope and member count of only around 100.<ref>{{Cite journal \|last1=Jemielniak \|first1=Dariusz \|last2=Rychwalska \|first2=Agnieszka \|last3=Talaga \|first3=Szymon \|last4=Ziembowicz \|first4=Karolina \|date=September 2021 \|title=Wikiproject Tropical Cyclones: The most successful crowd-sourced knowledge project with near real-time coverage of extreme weather phenomena \|journal=Weather and Climate Extremes \|volume=33 \|page=100354 \|doi=10.1016/j.wace.2021.100354 \|bibcode=2021WCE....3300354J \|doi-access=free }}</ref>		Pada 2007, Wikipedia berbahasa Inggris mengenalkan asesment dengan skala kualitas artikel.<ref name="WP 1.0 editorial team 1">{{citation \|title=Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment\|title-link=Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment}}</ref>{{Self-published inline\|date=November 2022}} Artikel-artikel tersebut dinilai oleh WikiProjects. Batasan tingkat kualitas dimulai dengan "Rintisan" (halaman dengan isian sangat sedikit), diikuti dengan "Start", "C" and "B" (dalam urutan kualitas). Ulasan dari anggota komunitas dibutuhkan untuk menjadikan sebuah artikel di tingkat terbaik: baik itu tingkat "A", "good article" atau yang tertinggi, "featured article". sekitar 4.4 juta artikel dan telah masuk daftar asasmen pada tahun 2015, sekitar 7,000 (0.16%) dari featured article or a featured list. One featured article per day, as selected by editors, appears on the main page of Wikipedia.<ref name="FMonday feat article patterns 1">{{cite journal\|url=https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2365/2182\|title=Comparing featured article groups and revision patterns correlations in Wikipedia\|journal=[[First Monday (journal)\|First Monday]]\|date=8 April 2009\|doi=10.5210/fm.v14i5.2365\|access-date=July 13, 2010\|last1=Poderi\|first1=Giacomo \|doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="IBM feat articles hidden pattern 1">{{cite journal\|url=http://www.research.ibm.com/visual/papers/hidden_order_wikipedia.pdf\|author1=Fernanda B. Viégas \|author2=Martin Wattenberg \|author3=Matthew M. McKeon \|name-list-style=amp \|title=The Hidden Order of Wikipedia\|publisher=Visual Communication Lab, IBM Research\|date=July 22, 2007\|access-date=October 30, 2007}}</ref> According to research in 2021, WikiProject [[Tropical cyclone\|Tropical Cyclones]] has the most quality content in terms of good articles and featured articles. This is unusual, due to the project's narrow scope and member count of only around 100.<ref>{{Cite journal \|last1=Jemielniak \|first1=Dariusz \|last2=Rychwalska \|first2=Agnieszka \|last3=Talaga \|first3=Szymon \|last4=Ziembowicz \|first4=Karolina \|date=September 2021 \|title=Wikiproject Tropical Cyclones: The most successful crowd-sourced knowledge project with near real-time coverage of extreme weather phenomena \|journal=Weather and Climate Extremes \|volume=33 \|page=100354 \|doi=10.1016/j.wace.2021.100354 \|bibcode=2021WCE....3300354J \|doi-access=free }}</ref>

	~~The articles can also be rated for importance by~~ WikiProjects. ~~Currently~~,{{when\|date=September 2019}} ~~there are~~ 5 ~~importance categories~~: "~~low~~", "~~mid~~", "~~high~~", "~~top~~", ~~and~~ "???" ~~for unclassified~~/~~unsure level~~. For a particular article, different WikiProjects may assign different importance levels.		Tiap tulisan juga dapat dinilai urgensinya oleh WikiProjects. Saat ini,{{when\|date=September 2019}} ada 5 kategori urgensi: "rendah", "sedang", "tinggi", "penting", dan "???" untuk level tanpa klasifikasi/belum jelas. For a particular article, different WikiProjects may assign different importance levels.

	The Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team has developed a table (shown below) that displays data of all rated articles by quality and importance, on the English Wikipedia. If an article or list receives different ratings by two or more WikiProjects, then the highest rating is used in the table and bar-chart.		The Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team has developed a table (shown below) that displays data of all rated articles by quality and importance, on the English Wikipedia. If an article or list receives different ratings by two or more WikiProjects, then the highest rating is used in the table and bar-chart.

Adminjavasatu: ←Membuat halaman berisi '{{short description|Organization of a group of participants in a wiki in order to achieve specific editing goals}} {{About||Wikipedia's internal page|:WP:WikiProject|self-ref=yes}} A '''WikiProject''', or '''Wikiproject''', is an affinity group for contributors with shared goals within the Wikimedia movement. WikiProjects are prevalent within the largest wiki, Wikipedia, and exist to varying degrees within sibling projects such...'

2023-10-06T06:51:46Z

←Membuat halaman berisi '{{short description|Organization of a group of participants in a wiki in order to achieve specific editing goals}} {{About||Wikipedia's internal page|:WP:WikiProject|self-ref=yes}} A '''WikiProject''', or '''Wikiproject''', is an affinity group for contributors with shared goals within the Wikimedia movement. WikiProjects are prevalent within the largest wiki, Wikipedia, and exist to varying degrees within sibling projects such...'

Halaman baru

{{short description|Organization of a group of participants in a wiki in order to achieve specific editing goals}}
{{About||Wikipedia's internal page|:WP:WikiProject|self-ref=yes}}

A '''WikiProject''', or '''Wikiproject''', is an [[affinity group]] for contributors with shared goals within the [[Wikimedia movement]]. WikiProjects are prevalent within the largest wiki, [[Wikipedia]], and exist to varying degrees within [[Wikimedia project|sibling projects]] such as [[Wiktionary]], [[Wikiquote]], [[Wikidata]], and [[Wikisource]]. They also exist in different languages, and translation of articles is a form of their collaboration.

During the [[COVID-19 pandemic]], [[CBS News]] noted the role of Wikipedia's WikiProject Medicine in maintaining the accuracy of articles related to the disease.<ref name="COVID-19">{{cite web|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-rise-of-wikipedia-as-a-source-of-medical-information/|title=The rise of Wikipedia as a source of medical information|first=Anthony|last=Laudato|publisher=[[CBS News]]|date=May 24, 2020}}</ref> Another WikiProject that has drawn attention is WikiProject Women Scientists, which was profiled by ''[[Smithsonian Magazine|Smithsonian]]'' for its efforts to improve coverage of women scientists which the profile noted had "helped increase the number of female scientists on Wikipedia from around 1,600 to over 5,000".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/how-college-student-led-wikiproject-women-scientists-180958423/|title=How a College Student Led the WikiProject Women Scientists|first=Jason|last=Daley|publisher=[[Smithsonian Magazine]]|date=March 15, 2016}}</ref>

==On Wikipedia==
Some Wikipedia WikiProjects are substantial enough to engage in cooperative activities with outside organizations relevant to the field at issue.

Wikipedia has thousands of WikiProjects, primarily divided between specific topical areas and performing specific maintenance tasks.<ref name="Ayers">Phoebe Ayers, Charles Matthews, Ben Yates, ''How Wikipedia Works: And how You Can be a Part of it'' (2008), p. 213.</ref><ref name="Broughton">{{cite book|author=Broughton, John|title=Wikipedia – The Missing Manual|title-link=Wikipedia – The Missing Manual|publisher=[[O'Reilly Media]]|year=2008|pages=165–175}}</ref> One task commonly performed by topical WikiProjects on Wikipedia is the assessment of the quality of articles that fall within that topic area.<ref name="Deng">Huijing Deng, Bernadetta Tarigan, Mihai Grigore, Juliana Sutanto, "Understanding the ‘Quality Motion’ of Wikipedia Articles Through Semantic Convergence Analysis", ''HCI in Business: Lecture Notes in Computer Science'', Vol. 9191 (July 21, 2015), p. 64-75.</ref> In Wikipedia and sibling projects, WikiProject pages are located in project space,<ref name="Ayers"/> and the meta information regarding the association between the article and the WikiProject is usually included on the talk page of the article.<ref name="Deng"/>

WikiProjects provide an additional avenue for engagement between editors with similar interests, and have thereby been found to increase the productivity of such editors.<ref name="Kraut">Robert E. Kraut, Paul Resnick, Sara Kiesler, ''Building Successful Online Communities'' (2012), p. 207, "WikiProjects are groups of editors who work together on articles within a domain, like military history, sports, or medicine".</ref> In order to spur participation and concentrate effectiveness, WikiProjects on Wikipedia may engage in activities like having a "collaboration of the week",<ref>Robert E. Kraut, Paul Resnick, Sara Kiesler, ''Building Successful Online Communities'' (2012), p. 38, "WikiProjects are groups of editors who work together on articles within a domain, like military history, sports, or medicine".</ref> or designating one article to be improved to the point of achieving "featured" status.<ref>Robert E. Kraut, Paul Resnick, Sara Kiesler, ''Building Successful Online Communities'' (2012), p. 85, "WikiProjects are groups of editors who work together on articles within a domain, like military history, sports, or medicine".</ref> The WikiProject Council is a group of editors that assists with the development of active WikiProjects, and acts as a central point for inter-WikiProject discussion and collaboration.

A 2008 [[Academic studies about Wikipedia|academic study of Wikipedia]] concluded that participation in WikiProjects substantially improved the chances of an editor becoming an administrator, finding that one Wikipedia policy edit or WikiProject edit is worth ten article edits,<ref>{{cite book |last1=Burke |first1=Moira |last2=Kraut |first2=Robert |chapter=Taking up the mop |page=3441 |year=2008 |doi=10.1145/1358628.1358871 |title=Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '08 |isbn=978-1-60558-012-8|s2cid=5868576 }}</ref> and concluding:

{{blockquote|
Merely performing a lot of production work is insufficient for "promotion" in Wikipedia. Candidates’ article edits were weak predictors of success. They also have to demonstrate more managerial behavior. Diverse experience and contributions to the development of policies and WikiProjects were stronger predictors of [[WP:RfA|RfA]] success. This is consistent with the findings that Wikipedia is a bureaucracy<ref name=buttler07>{{cite book | last1 = Butler | first1 = Brian | last2 = Joyce | first2 = Elisabeth | last3 = Pike | first3 = Jacqueline | chapter= Don't look now, but we've created a bureaucracy | page = 1101 | year = 2008 | doi = 10.1145/1357054.1357227 | title=Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '08| isbn = 9781605580111 | s2cid = 15211227 }}</ref> and that coordination work has increased substantially.<ref>{{cite book |author= Kittur, Aniket; Suh, Bongwon; Pendleton, Bryan A.; and Chi, Ed H. |year=2007 |chapter= He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia
|title= Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing |publisher=Association for Computing Machinery |pages=453–462 |doi=10.1145/1240624.1240698|isbn=978-1-59593-593-9|s2cid=17493296 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author1=Viegas, Fernanda B. |author2=Wattenberg, Martin |author3=Kriss, Jesse |author4=van Ham, Frank |title=2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07) |chapter=Talk Before You Type: Coordination in Wikipedia |year= 2007|pages=575–582|doi=10.1109/HICSS.2007.511 |isbn=978-0-7695-2755-0 |citeseerx=10.1.1.210.1057 |s2cid=5293547 }}</ref> [...] Participation in Wikipedia policy and WikiProjects was not predictive of adminship prior to 2006, suggesting the community as a whole is beginning to prioritize policymaking and organization experience over simple article-level coordination.
}}

===WikiProjects and assessments of article importance and quality===
{{Self reference|For related Wikipedia administration pages see [[Wikipedia:Content assessment]].}}
In 2007, the English Wikipedia introduced an assessment scale of the quality of articles.<ref name="WP 1.0 editorial team 1">{{citation |title=Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment|title-link=Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment}}</ref>{{Self-published inline|date=November 2022}} Articles are rated by WikiProjects. The range of quality classes begins with "Stub" (very short pages), followed by "Start", "C" and "B" (in increasing order of quality). Community peer review is needed for the article to enter one of the highest quality classes: either "A", "good article" or the highest, "featured article". Of the about 4.4 million articles and lists assessed as of March 2015, about 7,000 (0.16%) are a featured article or a featured list. One featured article per day, as selected by editors, appears on the main page of Wikipedia.<ref name="FMonday feat article patterns 1">{{cite journal|url=https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2365/2182|title=Comparing featured article groups and revision patterns correlations in Wikipedia|journal=[[First Monday (journal)|First Monday]]|date=8 April 2009|doi=10.5210/fm.v14i5.2365|access-date=July 13, 2010|last1=Poderi|first1=Giacomo |doi-access=free }}</ref><ref name="IBM feat articles hidden pattern 1">{{cite journal|url=http://www.research.ibm.com/visual/papers/hidden_order_wikipedia.pdf|author1=Fernanda B. Viégas |author2=Martin Wattenberg |author3=Matthew M. McKeon |name-list-style=amp |title=The Hidden Order of Wikipedia|publisher=Visual Communication Lab, IBM Research|date=July 22, 2007|access-date=October 30, 2007}}</ref> According to research in 2021, WikiProject [[Tropical cyclone|Tropical Cyclones]] has the most quality content in terms of good articles and featured articles. This is unusual, due to the project's narrow scope and member count of only around 100.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Jemielniak |first1=Dariusz |last2=Rychwalska |first2=Agnieszka |last3=Talaga |first3=Szymon |last4=Ziembowicz |first4=Karolina |date=September 2021 |title=Wikiproject Tropical Cyclones: The most successful crowd-sourced knowledge project with near real-time coverage of extreme weather phenomena |journal=Weather and Climate Extremes |volume=33 |page=100354 |doi=10.1016/j.wace.2021.100354 |bibcode=2021WCE....3300354J |doi-access=free }}</ref>

The articles can also be rated for importance by WikiProjects. Currently,{{when|date=September 2019}} there are 5 importance categories: "low", "mid", "high", "top", and "???" for unclassified/unsure level. For a particular article, different WikiProjects may assign different importance levels.

The Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team has developed a table (shown below) that displays data of all rated articles by quality and importance, on the English Wikipedia. If an article or list receives different ratings by two or more WikiProjects, then the highest rating is used in the table and bar-chart.

Researcher Giacomo Poderi found that articles tend to reach featured status via the intensive work of a few editors.<ref name="Poderi Giacomo feat articles 1">Poderi, Giacomo, ''Wikipedia and the Featured Articles: How a Technological System Can Produce Best Quality Articles'', Master thesis, [[University of Maastricht]], October 2008.</ref> A 2010 study found unevenness in quality among featured articles and concluded that the community process is ineffective in assessing the quality of articles.<ref name="FMonday WP quality control 1">{{cite journal|last=Lindsey|first=David|date=April 5, 2010|title=Evaluating quality control of Wikipedia's featured articles|url=https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2721/2482|journal=First Monday|volume=15|issue=4|access-date=January 29, 2017|archive-date=October 11, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171011033211/http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2721/2482|url-status=dead}}</ref>

<div style="float: right; padding-left: 7 px;">
</div>
{{User:WP 1.0 bot/Tables/OverallArticles}}
{{ #invoke:Chart | bar chart
| height = 700
| width = 800
| stack = 1
| group 1 = 1498 : 2340 : 2311 : 1747 : 173
| group 2 = 167 : 620 : 700 : 652 : 109
| group 3 = 331 : 652 : 768 : 548 : 83
| group 4 = 2990 : 6793 : 13786 : 17493 : 1657
| group 5 = 15677 : 30200 : 49228 : 56998 : 16771
| group 6 = 15740 : 49816 : 123010 : 257755 : 72963
| group 7 = 18644 : 90138 : 398061 : 1439596 : 383706
| group 8 = 4264 : 31953 : 279285 : 2639992 : 810004
| group 9 = 4560 : 16071 : 49914 : 172323 : 72033
| group 10 = 114 : 460 : 1192 : 15127 : 407539
| colors = violet : indigo : lightblue : darkgreen : lightgreen : yellow : orange : red : purple : black
| group names = Featured articles : Featured lists : A-class articles : Good articles : B-class articles : C-class articles : Start-class articles : Stub articles : Lists : Unassessed articles and lists
| x legends = Top : High : Medium : Low : ???
}}
{{Self reference|[Note: The table above (prepared by the [[Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team|Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team]]) is automatically updated daily by [[User:WP 1.0 bot]], but the bar-chart is not auto-updated.]}}

==WikiProject Medicine ==
WikiProject Medicine was formed in 2004 to improve coverage of medicine-related topics.<ref name=Trevena2011>{{Cite journal|last=Trevena|first=L.|date=2011-06-08|title=WikiProject Medicine|url=https://www.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmj.d3387|journal=BMJ|language=en|volume=342|issue=jun08 3|pages=d3387|doi=10.1136/bmj.d3387|pmid=21653617|s2cid=206893220|issn=0959-8138}}</ref><ref name=James2016>{{Cite journal|last=James|first=Richard|date=October 2016|title=WikiProject Medicine: Creating Credibility in Consumer Health|url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15323269.2016.1221284|journal=Journal of Hospital Librarianship|language=en|volume=16|issue=4|pages=344–351|doi=10.1080/15323269.2016.1221284|s2cid=79020792|issn=1532-3269}}</ref><ref name=Murray2015>{{Cite journal|last=Murray|first=Terry|date=2015-03-03|title=WikiProject Medicine making progress|journal=Canadian Medical Association Journal|language=en|volume=187|issue=4|pages=245|doi=10.1503/cmaj.109-4982|issn=0820-3946|pmc=4347770|pmid=25646285}}</ref>

A 2011 review of the project's efforts praised it for assessing most medical articles on Wikipedia (at that time about 25,000), at the same time remarking that only around 70 have been assessed as high quality.<ref name=Trevena2011/> The first use of Wikipedia medical content in formal medical education was in 2011.<ref name=smith2020/> A 2014 study found that the frequency of Wikipedia medical topics referenced in medical publications has increased over time since 2010, in spite of recommendations discouraging doctors from using Wikipedia, with the majority provided as definitions or descriptions.<ref name=bould2014>{{cite journal |vauthors=Bould MD, Hladkowicz ES, Pigford AA, Ufholz LA, Postonogova T, Shin E, Boet S |title=References that anyone can edit: review of Wikipedia citations in peer reviewed health science literature |journal=BMJ |volume=348 |issue= |pages=g1585 |date=March 2014 |pmid=24603564 |pmc=3944683 |doi=10.1136/bmj.g1585}}</ref>

A 2016 review written by Wikipedians{{efn|"Competing interests: All authors have contributed to Wikipedia articles. TS, DD, MH and JH are current participants in WP:MED. JH is a former and current member of the Wikimedia Foundation board of trustees. All authors are on the editorial board of WikiJournal of Medicine. TS is on the editorial board of PLOS Genetics."<ref name=shafee/> }} stated that the number of high quality articles had improved to about 80.<ref name=shafee/> The review praised the efforts of the volunteers, but said that participation levels are too low to promise any significant improvements in the thousands of lower-quality articles, calling for more medical practitioners to volunteer.<ref name="shafee">{{Cite journal|last1=Shafee|first1=Thomas|last2=Masukume|first2=Gwinyai|last3=Kipersztok|first3=Lisa|last4=Das|first4=Diptanshu|last5=Häggström|first5=Mikael|last6=Heilman|first6=James|date=2017-11-01|title=Evolution of Wikipedia's medical content: past, present and future|url=https://jech.bmj.com/content/71/11/1122|journal=J Epidemiol Community Health|volume=71|issue=11|pages=1122–1129|doi=10.1136/jech-2016-208601|issn=0143-005X|pmid=28847845|pmc=5847101}}</ref>{{efn|The article processing fee was covered by a rapid grant from the Wikimedia Foundation. The Foundation had no involvement in the study design, the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data, writing the report, or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.<ref name=shafee/> }} The review also said that readability (complexity) of Wikipedia articles may be too high for its intended audience, and encouraged the Wikipedia volunteers to review this aspect.<ref name=Murray2015/>

[[CBS News]] described the role of WikiProject Medicine in content about the [[COVID-19 pandemic]], stating that while "hot topics that get a lot of page views are carefully edited, inaccurate information persists on some of Wikipedia's less-read pages".<ref name=CBS2020>{{cite web|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-rise-of-wikipedia-as-a-source-of-medical-information/|title=The rise of Wikipedia as a source of medical information|first=Anthony|last=Laudato|publisher=[[CBS News]]|date=May 24, 2020 |access-date=April 3, 2023}}</ref> [[James Heilman]] told CBS News, "I do not recommend people trust Wikipedia blindly. I think doing so would be silly. Yet, you know, people shouldn't trust other sources of information blindly, either."<ref name= CBS2020/>

According to a review written by a Wikipedia contributor and advocate,{{efn|The author is a Wikipedia contributor and advocates for Wikipedia authorship to health workers, students, and faculty at McMaster University."<ref name=smith2020/> }}{{efn|"The Author declared in the cover letter being awarded a grant from the Wikimedia Foundation whose funding would cover this publication if accepted. Financial Disclosure section and Competing Interests section should be updated accordingly (in competing interests, I believe Author could specify having obtained the grant -after- completing and submitting this work)".<ref name= smith2020/> }} as of 2020, Wikipedia is among the world's most accessed resources for health information by the public, patients, students, and practitioners.<ref name=smith2020>{{cite journal |vauthors=Smith DA |title=Situating Wikipedia as a health information resource in various contexts: A scoping review |journal=PLOS ONE |volume=15 |issue=2 |pages=e0228786 |date=2020 |pmid=32069322 |pmc=7028268 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0228786|bibcode=2020PLoSO..1528786S |doi-access=free }}</ref>

==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
{{reflist|30em}}

[[Category:Wikipedia]]
[[Category:Wiki concepts]]